diff --git a/test/case/ietf_interfaces/ipv4_autoconf/Readme.adoc b/test/case/ietf_interfaces/ipv4_autoconf/Readme.adoc
index 7781348f..1d66d60c 100644
--- a/test/case/ietf_interfaces/ipv4_autoconf/Readme.adoc
+++ b/test/case/ietf_interfaces/ipv4_autoconf/Readme.adoc
@@ -1,22 +1,21 @@
 === IPv4 link-local
-
 ==== Description
-Verifies that linklocal (ZeroConf) work as expected
+Verifies that link-local (IPv4LL/ZeroConf) address assignment work as
+expected.  Checks random address, the request-address setting, and
+address removal on autoconf disable.
 
 ==== Topology
-
 ifdef::topdoc[]
 image::../../test/case/ietf_interfaces/ipv4_autoconf/topology.png[IPv4 link-local topology]
 endif::topdoc[]
 ifndef::topdoc[]
 ifdef::testgroup[]
-image::ipv4_autoconf/topology.png[IPv4 linklocal topology]
+image::ipv4_autoconf/topology.png[IPv4 link-local topology]
 endif::testgroup[]
 ifndef::testgroup[]
-image::topology.png[IPv4 linklocal topology]
+image::topology.png[IPv4 link-local topology]
 endif::testgroup[]
 endif::topdoc[]
-
 ==== Test sequence
 . Initialize
 . Configure an interface with IPv4 ZeroConf IP
@@ -27,3 +26,4 @@ endif::topdoc[]
 
 
 <<<
+
diff --git a/test/case/ietf_routing/static_routing/Readme.adoc b/test/case/ietf_routing/static_routing/Readme.adoc
index 0ac75a07..322faa67 100644
--- a/test/case/ietf_routing/static_routing/Readme.adoc
+++ b/test/case/ietf_routing/static_routing/Readme.adoc
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 === Static routing
 ==== Description
-Test that it is possible to use static routes (IPv4 and IPv6)
-works as expected
+Verify that it is possible to add static routes, both IPv4 and IPv6, and
+that data forwarding works as expected via an intermediate device.
 
 ==== Topology
 ifdef::topdoc[]
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ endif::topdoc[]
 . Configure targets
 . Wait for routes
 . Configure host addresses and routes
-. Verify that dut2 is reachable on 192.168.200.1 from PC:data
+. Verify that R2 is reachable on 192.168.200.1 from PC:data
 . Verify that R2 is reachable on 2001:db8:3c4d:200::1 from PC:data
 . Remove all static routes from R1
 . Verify R2 is no longer reachable on either IPv4 or IPv6 from PC:data
diff --git a/test/case/ietf_routing/static_routing/test.py b/test/case/ietf_routing/static_routing/test.py
index 84b69c62..4e744cb6 100755
--- a/test/case/ietf_routing/static_routing/test.py
+++ b/test/case/ietf_routing/static_routing/test.py
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 #        |
 #   +--------------+                +-------------+
 #   |              |192.168.50.0/24 |             |
-#   |  DUT1     .1 +----------------+ .2  DUT2    |-192.168.200.1/32 (lo)
+#   |    R1     .1 +----------------+ .2    R2    |-192.168.200.1/32 (lo)
 #   |        .1    |                |  .1         |
 #   +--+------+----+                +---+-----+---+
 #      |      |                               |
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
 """
 Static routing
 
-Test that it is possible to use static routes (IPv4 and IPv6)
-works as expected
+Verify that it is possible to add static routes, both IPv4 and IPv6, and
+that data forwarding works as expected via an intermediate device.
 """
 import infamy
 import infamy.route as route
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ with infamy.Test() as test:
             ns0.addip("192.168.10.2")
             ns0.addroute("192.168.200.1/32", "192.168.10.1")
 
-        with test.step("Verify that dut2 is reachable on 192.168.200.1 from PC:data"):
+        with test.step("Verify that R2 is reachable on 192.168.200.1 from PC:data"):
             ns0.must_reach("192.168.200.1")
 
         with test.step("Verify that R2 is reachable on 2001:db8:3c4d:200::1 from PC:data"):
diff --git a/test/case/infix_dhcp/dhcp_routes/Readme.adoc b/test/case/infix_dhcp/dhcp_routes/Readme.adoc
index 472d1617..d3c167d8 100644
--- a/test/case/infix_dhcp/dhcp_routes/Readme.adoc
+++ b/test/case/infix_dhcp/dhcp_routes/Readme.adoc
@@ -1,22 +1,30 @@
-=== DHCP router
+=== DHCP option 121 vs option 3
 ==== Description
-Verify DHCP option 121 (staticroutes) is used over option 3 and that the routes exist in
-the operational datastore
+Verify DHCP option 121 (staticroutes) is used over option 3 and that the
+routes exist in the operational datastore.
+
+Installing unrelated routes from a DHCP server should not affect already
+existing routes.  To verify this a canary route is set up in the client
+before initiating DHCP.  This canary route does not need to be reachable
+before a DHCP lease has been acquired.
 
 ==== Topology
 ifdef::topdoc[]
-image::../../test/case/infix_dhcp/dhcp_routes/topology.png[DHCP router topology]
+image::../../test/case/infix_dhcp/dhcp_routes/topology.png[DHCP option 121 vs option 3 topology]
 endif::topdoc[]
 ifndef::topdoc[]
 ifdef::testgroup[]
-image::dhcp_routes/topology.png[DHCP router topology]
+image::dhcp_routes/topology.png[DHCP option 121 vs option 3 topology]
 endif::testgroup[]
 ifndef::testgroup[]
-image::topology.png[DHCP router topology]
+image::topology.png[DHCP option 121 vs option 3 topology]
 endif::testgroup[]
 endif::topdoc[]
 ==== Test sequence
-. Initialize
+. Setting up client
+. Verify client use classless routes, option 121
+. Verify client did *not* use option 3
+. Verify client has canary route, 20.0.0.0/24
 
 
 <<<